Archive for October, 2010

Maximizing Social Media’s Power to Reach and Teach

Friday, October 29th, 2010

Guest blog post by Ronald Ladouceur, Executive Vice President and Executive Creative Director, Media Logic

B2C brands are discovering the remarkable reach of social promotions.

Pepsi has reported that every entry in its Refresh Project generates, on average, 5,000 votes. That means the 5,000 projects Pepsi had approved and posted to its Refresh site by June 2010 generated 25 million direct engagements. And those 25 million represent only the tip of the iceberg relative to the total media reach generated by the 5,000 posters who promoted their causes through their own social networks.

Social promotions, defined here as any intentional social engagement – queries, polls, contests and other structured invitations to interact with a brand – seed the social landscape, trigger interaction and inspire sharing. Their success is changing how brands look at social media – reducing fears and opening minds.

Many organizations have been slow to the social media party, citing the inability to control messaging as the main reason for their hesitance. And certainly the waves of negative comments generated by the political missteps and bad design decisions of brands like Whole Foods, Target, Best Buy and Gap only make nervous brands even more so. But brands still standing on the sidelines should stop looking at the mistakes their competitors have made and instead focus on the successes they are having.

Facebook is helping brands mitigate negativity. It now allows brands to implement segregated Facebook walls where the posts of “others” are not immediately visible and also collapses comments so they too are not immediately visible. But even before Facebook implemented these options, brands had already demoted the wall by landing visitors on a promotions tab by default. Probably to their general relief and great surprise, companies from Pepsi to American Eagle Outfitters discovered their social fans and followers didn’t mind. In fact, they seem to prefer the control offered by promotions to the wild west of freeform conversation.

Promotions, it appears, provide a necessary context for consumers. Rather than shutting down two-way conversation, promotions open up the engagement faucet.

All by itself, this is cool. Promotions work, and their ROI, at least relative to reach, can be directly measured.

But promotions can do more than reach. Promotions can also teach.

Thanks to tools like Alterian’s SM2, promotions can become research instruments that in sum are potentially more valuable (and certainly more timely) than traditional data gathering techniques. Promotions by their nature constrain the question set social media monitoring tools are asked to explore. Consequently, the information returned is of exponentially greater interest and greater value.

I must offer a few caveats. First, social promotions are only valuable as research instruments if the organization issuing them is social itself. Merely having a Facebook page or Twitter stream does not qualify. Organizations must be able to share information and ideas across departments. Second, promotions need an audience. If a brand does not enjoy a large fan/follower/email base, its social promotions will need additional media support in order to gain traction.

Media Logic, with its Zeitgeist & Coffeesm dynamic content management environment, is among a new generation of marketing agencies pioneering the development of behind-the-scenes networks designed to take social media integration to the next level. These networks connect critical departments within organizations – like product development, community relations, sales and marketing – and through marketing, connect the brand to the entire social world. Combining a behind-the-scenes social network with a public social network into a single manageable whole allows brands to maximize the power of social media to reach and teach.

To learn more about Media Logic and Zeitgeist & Coffee, visit www.mlinc.com.

Ronald Ladouceur will present our November 2nd webinar, Buh-Bye Traditional Data Gathering: Step into the Spotlight with Cooperative Social Media Marketing. He will use first-hand research and experience working with B2C brands to demonstrate how you can develop measurable social promotions.

Ron-Ladouceur Ladouceur has led Media Logic’s foray into interactive and online media back in the early 1990s and continues to oversee Media Logic’s interactive services team today. He oversees all creative and design services and has been a driving force in the development of Media Logic’s Zeitgeist & CoffeeSM process, a social marketing protocol that has garnered national interest among companies looking for help in defining their social media strategy.  

In his role as executive vice president, Ladouceur helps manage and direct the agency and promote its products and services. As executive creative director, he leads Media Logic’s branding and high-level strategic marketing efforts and directly supervises all creative teams.
 

 

Marketing Leaders call for a new kind of relationship

Friday, October 29th, 2010

Are you ‘doing to’, ‘doing with’ or ‘doing for’ you customers? In this week’s video blog, Stan Rapp talks about this concept and gives some great examples of how companies are being successful by ‘doing things for’ their customers.

Don Peppers and Mike Fisher talk about the humanness that is now required in engagement  with customers, and that even though we know companies are brands, we want to believe they are human so we look for human qualities like sincerity and trustability.

It is clear the new relationship we need with customers is more like the one we have with our friends and at Alterian we are working hard to reflect this in how we build our engagement solutions, for example our engagement cycle – Listen, Learn, Understand, Speak – mirrors what one would do in a natural human conversation.

So in summary, consumers don’t want to be talked at any more, they want to engage and this calls for marketing to build a new kind of relationship enabled by technology, that is human in nature. Enjoy the video.

What the heck is "Inbound" marketing? And should you care?

Thursday, October 28th, 2010

Recently, there’s been a lot of talk about “inbound” marketing being the best way to generate leads. For a lot of marketers, however, there is still quite a bit of confusion around what exactly that means.

To start, “inbound” can be a very misleading term. In reality, inbound marketing is about as outbound as any traditional marketing strategy. So… what is an inbound strategy you ask? Recently I asked Sean Dwyer, CEO over at Loopfuse to offer a definition, and he came up with “using all possible channels, with an emphasis on social and search, to drive highly customer centric messaging.” Sounded pretty good to me.

What really differentiates inbound is the emphasis on the social and search channels. The way customers interact with brands is becoming more digital and social everyday, and this combo promises to be the most efficient and effective way to build awareness. Capitalizing on this, however, is dependent on creating content that is in demand.

Therefore, being customer centric is core to inbound marketing. Just like the other new schools of thought around “engagement” or “content” marketing, everything is based around the customer. To create compelling, relevant content you need to have a thorough understanding of the customer. Period. If you can’t get this right, you will not be successful with any of these approaches.

Another compelling element of inbound is the use of social as a proactive, managed marketing channel. While I certainly believe in the need for valuable content, at times I feel the social fundamentalists have lost sight of that fact we are marketers. As unpleasant as it may sound, as marketers, we exist to sell stuff. Don’t be afraid to be what you are. Campaigning and marketing in the social world is okay. It just has a different etiquette that must be respected.

Advertising is moving from the periphery of the page to the center. When you develop content that is valuable and interesting it can take on a life of its own. The concept of earned is important. Unlike paid media, like display or television where you pay for your impressions, social distribution is based upon the opinions of your audience. If they like it, they will share it near and far in a medium that’s far more trusted than any paid medium.

clip_image002

(Alterian Brands At Risk)

While maybe lacking some of the sex appeal, search also plays an important role. Yes, Google rankings are important, but you should also be taking emerging search channels like Facebook or LinkedIn into consideration. Regardless of the engine, there are structural best practices you should be incorporating into your content creation. SEO is a vocational skill set that you can’t afford to have underdeveloped.

In conclusion, if you are responsible for lead generation for your organization, then you should be educating yourself on inbound marketing. Beyond the increased awareness you can achieve with social and search campaigns, refocusing on the customer can also help your traditional on and offline campaigns. For B2B and B2B2C marketers, inbound marketing should be a high priority item for the next twelve months.

CTRL-C and CTRL-V?

Wednesday, October 27th, 2010

It’s funny when I’m talking to a mixed audience about the USP’s of our Web Content Management System (CMS). The type of things they love to hear is as diverse as the audience. The fact that our Web CMS is part of a bigger customer engagement story appeals to one person, the fact that you can drag an item straight from your desktop into the Web CMS repository appeals to another.

However, it’s good to remember the real business drivers behind the replacement of an existing Web CMS. No matter how noble the business strategy may be, in the end it boils down to being able to use the tool for what it’s meant to be used for in an efficient manner. And if you think about it, it’s very much about content gathering, processing and outputting for the sake of better customer engagement. A Web CMS should support this from A to Z, eliminating repetitive or error prone tasks.

Therefore, don’t forget the basics when selecting your Web CMS. It should be easy to use. It should help you to copy and paste content from Word or an email without using Notepad, stripping out that nasty HTML for you. It should be accessible through every browser. And most importantly, it should be able to store digital assets regardless of output channel, so that you can repurpose it across multiple websites, email deployments and social media channels, improving consistency of your brand and messaging.

So when you’re in the process of selecting a new Web CMS, ask the vendor about vision, roadmap and strategy to understand the direction of the company. But equally important, ensure you select a tool that does the job well, checking out references and mapping it against common use cases in your organization. Get end users involved, and let them try to carry out day-to-day tasks to see how the system supports them. Because in the end, slick demo-ware scenarios presented by the vendor -which may be cool but not be applicable to your business – do not help you run a successful project. Getting buy-in from your end users that love the new tool and see how it’s going to make their working life easier and more efficient will.

Did you include a representative group of end-users in your latest Web CMS project?

Does your organization engage with customers or broadcast?

Monday, October 25th, 2010

There are a lot of great point solutions out there to address specific functionality needs such as Web Analytics, Web Content Management, Campaign Management, Email Marketing, Social Media Monitoring and Analytics.  Many organizations have a plethora of software from different vendors addressing these needs, or they develop their own solutions in-house to meet their exacting requirements. 

One of the benefits of investing in a platform which delivers all of this is that all of the information can be collected in terms of offline and online data which is centrally available to marketing, enabling better customer segmentation and improved awareness in how people interact with various touch-points within an organization.  Also, understanding what content generates the most interest by an individual means that you can highly influence the way in which you engage Broadcast-300x300with them and move away from the “one size fits all” marketing which many companies still deploy.  These messages then engage with individuals, extending relevant offers and content, rather than simply broadcasting to them.

Has your organization implemented these solutions and managed to integrate this valuable information effectively?  What challenges did you face?  Were IT, Sales and Marketing involved in scoping these solutions, or were the requirements driven from departmental silos without collaboration?

Marketing thought leaders share their perspectives on engagement, 1:1 marketing and iMarketing

Friday, October 22nd, 2010

Recently, over 500 senior marketing professionals converged on Chicago to attend Alterian’s Engaging Times Summit. Keynote speakers and marketing legends Stan Rapp, of Enguage, and Don Peppers, of Peppers and Rogers Group, shared their thoughts on stage, and off. In this first show, hear why they and Alterian’s Mike Fisher are encouraging marketers and leaders to adopt “new thinking for a new age”.

This is the first in a series of video blogs from the Summit. Please enjoy and share, after all as Don says we are all social animals.

The Art of Re-engagement

Thursday, October 21st, 2010

The advent of behavioral targeting in email platforms has led many marketers to develop a far greater understanding of who is engaging with their emails, but also who isn’t. This understanding can often present some frightening statistics, as it is not unusual for some marketers to discover that close to 50% of their subscribers have not engaged with their emails in at least the last 6 months.

This presence of inactive addresses will not only impact revenue, but it will also have a detrimental effect on the following:

· Inbox delivery rates – Many ISP’s are now using customer interaction to determine whether to deliver or block email messages.

· Conflicting reporting – Including non-actives in your reporting means you don’t get a true reflection of your email programs performance

With this new understanding comes the talk of re-engagement and how to get those inactive subscribers back into the habit of interacting with your brand. After all, these people were once interested enough in your products and services to give you their email address. I would like to highlight a couple of our current favorite approaches to re-engagement.  In this case, re-engaging a lost customer and re-engaging an inactive email subscriber.

Engaging a lost customer:clip_image001

This email sent by Firebox is sent to recipients who have historically purchased regularly, but who haven’t made a purchase for a period of four months.

The email uses very little personalization, but it does include a voucher code to incentivize the recipient and to make the message feel more personable. The subject line of “Firebox misses you – have five pounds off” reminds the recipient of the relationship, while the body of the email acknowledges that purchases have been made in the past but not recently. They entice the recipient to visit the website to see ‘tons’ of new items they’ve added. And as an incentive to purchase, they’ve given a code to use to get £5 off.

Interestingly, Firebox have adopted a plain text approach for this email campaign.

Engaging a lost subscriber:

clip_image002

This email sent by Opodo is sent to recipients who have stopped opening emails.

The email focuses on reminding the recipient what they have been missing out on in recent newsletters as well as providing plenty of calls to action to visit the website. 

The subject line of “Is this goodbye?” really stands out as being different to their usual sales promotions.

Other nice touches within the email are that they ask the recipient to email them with feedback on what they can do to make the newsletters more interesting as well as promoting Twitter if the email channel is not right for them. Evidence that incorporating social media into your email marketing works!

 

LikeMinds: Is content creation or curation more valuable?

Tuesday, October 19th, 2010

As always, the LikeMinds conference is a tasty proposition and the kind of event where you will clear your calendar in order to attend. It consistently delivers. This time round, the event focuses on creativity and curation and how these two elements of media are growing and bringing value across sectors.

The question to which I would like enlightenment is this: Which is more valuable – creation or curation? If, for example, I share a blog post that I have crafted and lovingly written myself, and I seed it throughout my networks in order to put it in front of a wider audience (and hopefully an interested one), the primary metric that I am after is views. In addition to that I would seek comments, insight, conversation and to be challenged.

If I find a blog post that is not of my own creation and I choose to endorse the content with a retweet, a thumb-fresh Facebook Like or a reblog on Tumblr, and that subsequently is seeded into my networks and other people are also of the opinion that the article was indeed very good, that they then retweet it, Like it and reblog it – It is possible that the sharing of someone else’s content gets me more page views than spending time creating content of my own.

Is there value in sharing the content of others, or does it just add to the echo chamber and a race for the prize of popularity? I can near guarantee that the tidal wave of retweets of an article on Mashable are retweets for the sake of it, and at a push, the article has been read in full by only a handful. This is not the fault of Mashable per se, their editorial direction is savvy and quick to react to what is being talked about. That’s just good monitoring.

The bigger picture of this is evidenced in the media industry itself. When the bottom of the creation market falls out thanks to over-curation and freely available media, what is the point in so many creating? Is it really a case of every time you click a ‘Tweet this’ button a Journalist dies?

Will the Real Marketing Automation Please Stand Up

Friday, October 15th, 2010

At one point I could have given you a pretty clear, concise definition of what this term meant.  Now, as with CRM before, or “social” currently, it’s been adopted by so many different people that it’s been pulled into an unrecognizable shape.

Sifting through all the current vendor messaging one common theme that does emerge is the emphasis on data.  To enact any type of response or treatment, from a systematic standpoint, you need to have information to base it on.  Where a human can act on instinct, a tool is dependent on the data.

Overall, I think this is a healthy construct to be promoting into the marketing world.  We’ve all been educated and conditioned to depend on our intuition and a moment of inspirational genius.  In our socially connected, digital world, however, we now have better options.  As marketing interactions have migrated to online channels it has created an abundance of data.  Unlike any time before, we can now report on the impact of our marketing from customer, channel, or content perspectives.  This rounded view enables focusing on performance management, not just execution.

Another common concept, and where the differentiation begins, has to do with automated response.  Names range from “drip”, “lifecycle”, “nurturing”, “triggered”  and just about everything in-between.  Regardless of convention, however, they all focus on presenting a decision driven workflow where based upon a condition one action versus and another is taken.

The other major differentiator is then upon what, and the timeliness that a decision can be evaluated:

With traditional systems, that were developed to handle large scale direct mail and then email campaigns, the automation is usually separated from the campaign.  As such, they are usually dependent upon the batch movement of data and trigger on things like additions to a loyalty file, or coupon redemption at the POS.

Vendors:  Alterian, Aprimo, ExactTarget, Lyris, Neolane, Responsys, SAS, Silverpop, SmartFocus, Unica, etc.

The next generation systems are much more geared to digital channels and focus on things like page views, form registrations, and email.  These systems also are more real time (varying widths of grey here) and do not depend on batch processes.

Vendors:  ActOn, Eloqua, Genius, Loopfuse, Manticore, Market Bright, Marketo, OfficeAutoPilot, Optify, Pardot, etc.

While today there may be a schism, these two worlds are on a collision path.  Really what has separated them has been semantics.  Both camps are fundamentally based on the concept of leveraging data to drive marketing performance and take similar approaches to getting there.  Already you’ve seen some firms like Neolane, Aprimo, Eloqua, and most recently Alterian cross over and the rest, or the survivors at any rate, are sure to follow suit.

The future of marketing automation is bright and poised for wider adoption.  As the strengths of these generations, enterprise scalability and real time digital interactions, are united they going to unlock the ability to improve the efficiency of their marketing spends and most importantly the quality of interaction delivered to the customer.

Takeaways:

-          The core unifying concept of marketing automation is using hard data to make decisions

-          Support for digital channels and real time interactions is a big differentiator

-          A big factor in the success of a platform is ease and speed in which you can teach it to “think”

-          The next generation of marketing automation will narrow, if not eliminate the gap between the current generations

What do you see for the future of marketing?

Social Commerce – Are You Ready?

Monday, October 11th, 2010

 

Last week I attended Altimeter’s event titled “Rise of Social Commerce”. I knew that it would be a great event and it definitely more than met my expectations!

The Altimeter group lined up an amazing set of speakers which offered incredible networking opportunities. I appreciated how they positioned it as ‘we’ are the early adopters and were there to learn together.

Here are some key takeaways from Day 1:

Definition of Social Commerce: The use of Social Technologies to connect, listen, understand and engage to improve the shopping experience.

  1. Need to redesign the shopping experience – so it’s not pushing – but rather being social.
  2. People want to shop in the palm of their hand. They want to give feedback on the what’s on the shelf and the products
  3. Need to create frictionless commerce.
    1. How do we redesign the buying experience?
    2. How do we enrich the engagement processes
  4. Need to anticipate what people want

Bob Kupbens, VP of e-Commerce, Delta said that we need to shift from transactional to emotional.

  • How many screens does it take to book a ticket? How can it be made more interesting?
  • His suggestions were:
    • Go where the customers are at
    • Engage in natural conversations
    • Leverage the tools available to you

One phrase that I loved was, “Marketers and retailers have an opportunity to delight. We need to provide relevant content to the right people.”

Manish Mehta,VP of Global Online for Dell, gave a great presentation. He said that social isn’t just a campaign, but it’s a harmony across the fabric of a company. He suggested that we need to think beyond social commerce and consider creating social businesses. I was very impressed that Dell has created a Social Media and Community University & have trained 1500 employees face to face. They are also creating a Listening Command Center that will be staffed 24/7. It will be unveiled before the end of the year.

The most profound takeaway from Manish’s presentation was, “Campaigns are really a huge risk. You’re paying for building a very expensive fan following. (and to what end?).

Brian Solis, author of Engage!, always has very insightful things to say. His main point was that customers want a dialogue. He suggested focusing on:

  • active listening & learning
  • engaging in meaningful dialogue
  • adapting
  • shaping experiences
  • driving action

People are social consumers. 23% of Twitter users follow businesses to receive special deals and promotions.

He suggested that there is now a fifth ‘C’.

  • Community
  • Content
  • Conversation/Communication
  • Connection
    • Commerce

Altimeter livestreamed the event and has made all of the slides available. I believe that the recordings will also be coming soon.

A recap of Day 2 coming soon!