Archive for April, 2009

Maintaining brand reputation against all odds

Monday, April 27th, 2009

Interesting post on Customer Think looking at the issues of maintaining a brand image when there are a host of people out there that may have other ideas.

Big brands suffer most, Microsoft’s new “Surface” system was in for a pounding on Twitter when an agency granted access to the box wrote a “jokey” tweet saying that turning the machine on had defeated four college eduacted staff members and they had to call the help desk.  They later cleared up the story, but lots of people love to hate Microsoft and the word was out… Truth is that some brands have a whole group of people waiting to strike whenever there’s a negative story – managing that is a challenge some brands will be glad they don’t have to worry about – but perhaps the most persecuted have a lot to gain by interacting with their detractors…

Look at what happened to Domino’s recently when a couple of its employees posted some “prank” videos showing how they defile the delivery food. They posted a response video on YouTube & propagated that via twitter.

Some people say the damage could have been thwarted faster had Domino’s been listening in on the social media. Some say it was too little too late. Domino’s has now been forced to incorporate ORM into its business.

via Of Trust & Reputation in Social CRM | CustomerThink – CRM, CEM & Social Media – Think, Feel & Connect.

Social media is a channel for baby boomers too

Monday, April 20th, 2009

Social media is often considered to be a phenomenon of the young.  Certainly new media agencies tend to target their activities on the younger age groups and marketers often leave products targeted at mature audiences to more traditional channels.  Recent research from European Technographics casts doubt on this strategy as it shows that many baby boomers are regularly active on social networking sites. 

This shows that it is time for all marketers to consider the new channels as an important part of their marketing mix. 

Below is an excerpt from Forrester’s blog with more details.

More than one-third of European online consumers ages 43 to 63 already read social media such as blogs and forums on a regular basis, and around one-tenth are already uploading their own content — such as videos and music — onto the Web. Overall, 47% of Younger Boomers (online adults ages 43 to 52) now engage with social media on a regular basis, and 41% of Older Boomers (those ages 53 to 63) do. Boomers in the different European countries exhibit different behaviors, just as their younger compatriots do – for example, 69% of Dutch 43- to 52-year-olds (and 60% of 53- 63-year-olds) use social media on a regular basis, whilst only around a third of German Boomers do.

via The Forrester Blog For Interactive Marketing Professionals.

The Social Web – Be yourself… or find someone who is.

Monday, April 20th, 2009

I recently read and commented on one of the many great blog posts out there that give advice on how companies approach the social web, in this article Kevin Gibbons lays down some basics – have a purpose, write well, be transparent and to basically be nice to your audience.

All great points. My comment was to be yourself, be a person.

In my experience, the social web seems to be much more people centric than the rigid old days of communicating over the web through fairly static ‘brochureware’ sites and brand engagement built around established channels of marketing, sales and support.   

Over the social web people will respond to you being you rather than a faceless corporate. There is also the old saying that ‘people buy from people’ and the social web gives you a great opportunity to return to this personal engagement.

But a few days after making the comment, it occurred to me it’s not as straightforward as that – who best represents ‘you’ as a company, as a brand?

Your CEO? Whilst he probably embodies ‘you’ as a financial entity, the acceptable face of ‘you’ to the city, to the accountants, he may not resonate with the people who buy your products. Alright, there are exceptions, but not every company has a Steve Jobs at the helm. Similarly one of your talented engineers may be able to out geek a darkened room of Metallica fans – but is he you?

How about this from the blogs of ZDNet – Is it time for a Chief Social Media Officer? of putting someone at the C-level to sort it all out? 

The answer will be different in every company and is probably dictated more by the kind of audience you have – but it seems to me that companies should invest time in finding and enabling whoever is ‘you’ in the organization and encouraging them to contribute to your website, tweet, blog, set up discussion groups etc, give them the time and maybe the title to do that.

 

There is inevitably more than one ‘you’  - a social web strategy should consider relevancy as of course ‘you’ are different to different audiences and those different audiences will be on different channels.

The stock exchange know you are innovative, but ultimately safe and the CEO creating a MySpace page will do nothing to enhance ‘you’. But if you sell skateboards and your cool new intern likes to video himself throwing himself off the steps of the town hall for some ‘gnarly’ moves – then his MySpace page probably will.   

So, be yourself and if you can’t do that, find the people who are.

Authenticity from Tom Smith's Drawing Board

Authenticity from Tom Smith's Drawing Board

 

 

 Update 20th April 09 — cartoon kindly contributed by Tom Smith,  see more from the drawing board of Tom Smith here

 

Online spending set to decrease

Saturday, April 18th, 2009

Brian Quinton comments in his blog on the state of the US web spend, identifying decreases in spending on display advertising.  It seems that in this economy the fixed cost per view of an advertisment displayed on a users browser is a turn off compared to the delivery of clicks on search term hits – the later being much more results focussed. 

The principle that display ads are less cost effective than search is largely down to the targeting.  Certainly for those retailing products on the Internet, “search” is the a great way of driving traffic, but better targeting of audiences for advertisments would also yield a more performance driven model.

On line advertising targeting is under a lot of pressure however, given the EU action over Phorm and the general distrust of the use of private information across Facebook and other sites – so perhaps this route will remain more untargeted as a result.

Here’s an extract from the blog post,follow the link to see the whole post:

It’s become almost a truism that marketers are running to measurable media in this tough economy, to ensure that their ad spending is working to full potential. And most observers say that means a strong shift in favor of online channels.

But that trend doesn’t mean online ad spending will thrive in this period of slashed overall marketing budgets. And sure enough, a new forecast from media analysts Screen Digest revises the agency’s 2009 predictions for U.S. online ad spending downward. The forecast now says that spending on Web marketing in America will decline by almost 5% this year, mostly because of cutbacks related to the down economy.

via Online Ads Not So Bulletproof After All: Forecast | The Big Fat Marketing Blog.

What Works in Email (Even Now)

Saturday, April 18th, 2009

In the fight for numbers email marketers are frequently just blasting lists again and again.  This is no way to treat newsletter or other regular email subscribers, you need to communicate relevant information and make sure that you don’t over burden them.

I’ve already listed some of my tips on this blog, but I saw this interesting post on the Marketing Profs Daily Fix blog that is interesting reading.  Personally I’m all for maximising the relationships with people on the list rather than just trying to make a big file.

No one’s got a big budget these days, but we’ve all got big goals. For email marketers, the pressure is high to build the file, despite the lack of resources.

via What Works in Email (Even Now) | Marketing Profs Daily Fix Blog.

Is it time to wave the white flag in the war on spam?

Friday, April 17th, 2009

Maintaining relevance in email is increasingly important for all on line marketers.  This channel that is perceived as being low cost can reap havoc for a brand that uses it unwisely.  With so much email being reported as spam it is vital for the email marketer to ensure that their messages are well timed, relevant and interesting.

A recipient opting out of receiving brand messages is always a blow for a marketer – being considered a spammer can be worse with ISPs blocking other recipients from receiving messages.

Being blocked by an ISP means a lot of work with many emails and phone calls to restablish deliverability.  This can be avoided by creating emails that are engaging and relevant, then not sending too many of them!

An interesting article on eConsultancy quotes a report claiming 97% of email is now considered spam!

Spam. It’s the scourge of the internet yet we just can’t seem to get rid of it. The more sophisticated our defenses get, the more sophisticated the spammers become. The war on spam is the quintessential cat and mouse game.

via Is it time to wave the white flag in the war on spam? | Blog | Econsultancy.

Carphone Warehouse: confessions of a corporate tweeter

Friday, April 17th, 2009

There are lots of articles about how brands should use Twitter. They all give good sound advice to the budding corporate tweeter: listen before you dive in, have something relevant to say, or learn from cases like Motrin or Skittles.

This is all very generic though, so let me try to give you my random insights and observations as @guy1067, a corporate tweeter for Carphone Warehouse.

via Confessions of a corporate tweeter | Blog | Econsultancy.

 

Having embarked on the Twitter journey myself I found this “in context” article very useful.  Though clearly Carphone Warehouse has an easier time than many as the products they carry are widely discussed…

 

Despite rumours to the contrary, direct mail is not dead!

Friday, April 17th, 2009

The marketing acumen of yesterday…today!

Product marketers today should not be congratulating themselves on how much smarter they are than the Don Drapers of some mythic marketing past. Instead, we should take a humbler view of how the marketing discipline adapts to current exigencies. That perspective makes it easier to understand why some traditional elements of the marketing mix, such as direct mail, haven’t withered in the light of social media.

via The Forrester Blog For Technology Product Management & Marketing Professionals.

Interesting how so many new marketers find it hard to believe that direct mail, events, printed media and television adverts are still important in building and promoting a brand.  A lesson for all of us worrying about being on line and forgetting our roots.

EC starts legal action over Phorm

Friday, April 17th, 2009

Jim Killock, executive director of the Open Rights Group said: “There are big legal questions surrounding BT’s use of Phorm, so we welcome the EU taking the government to task.

“BT should respect everyone’s privacy and drop their plans to snoop on the internet before they damage their own reputation further. Websites should protect their users and block Phorm now.”

via BBC NEWS | Technology | EC starts legal action over Phorm.

It will be interesting to see how many other sites start demanding that their content is not scanned by Phorm – there is now a public wave of interest over this issue.

This legal action does refer to the trials where consent was not requested – rolling out Phorm would require user acceptance of their data being monitored.

Loyalty membership up, activity not

Friday, April 17th, 2009

Membership in loyalty rewards programs in the US has reached a high of 1.808 billion — a 24% jump since Colloquys last census in 2007. There are 14.1 loyalty program memberships per household, however, only 6.2 are actively used. Active participation is relatively flat compared to 2007. Colloquy researchers say that this consumer non-engagement with loyalty programs is a call for marketers to increase the value of their programs, rather than the size.

via Colloquy: Loyalty membership up, activity not – DMNews.

So it seems hard times are making it more interesting for consumers to join membership schemes, but the low level of relevant messaging and offers is not engaging those new consumers and so the exercise is largely wasted. 

The value of a loyalty program is not necessarily in creating higher value offers, but in making a small number of offers to a consumer that match their requirement. 

If you make too many offers then the recipient will probably not plow through dozens to find the one that would have appealed.  As per usual this is about targeting relevant communications to make a difference.